At a glance
The Grave
Life story
Further information
Death
Census and miscellaneous information
Mansion House, Church Lane, Debden, Essex
Richard aged 37, late captain 17th Lancers (retired). Elizabeth aged 29. Reginald aged 9. Beaufort aged 6. Cecil aged 4. Blanche aged 1 month. Anne Ward aged 62, mother-in-law. Plus a governess, butler, footman, lady's maid, cook, nurse, groom, monthly nurse and four servants.
Vicarage, Ingleby, Greenhow, Yorkshire.
Reginald aged 18, pupil, student studying under the Vicar Henry Toovey.
27 Marine Parade, Worthing.
Reginald aged 28, student of theology. Lucy aged 27.
Kai Terri' St Michael's Road, Worthing.
Reginald aged 40, own means, paralysed. Lucy aged 37. Annie Hughes aged 42, trained hospital nurse. Plus 2 servants.
The Sportsman 16th Oct 1878
A MOST INTERESTING CASE IN COURT
A rather important case was tried yesterday in the Exchequer Division of the High Court of Justice, at Westminster, before Mr Baron Huddleston and a common jury. Thomas Pearson, who described himself as a betting man, residing at Cambridge, sued Mr Reginald Charles Douglas-Lane, a young gentleman of considerable private means, and formerly an undergraduate at the University of Cambridge, to recover the sum of £500., which was the amount of acceptance drawn by Josiah Mouncey upon the defendant. The case first had the appearance of being in connection with betting transactions, but it turned out to be a money-lending affair, and disclosed state matters at our university towns which only occasionally come to light. The defendant is the son of the late Captain Douglas-Lane, who was one time well known as an extensive owner of racehorses in Nottingham and Norfolk. Mixed up with Pearson in the matter were two brothers, Josiah and George Mouncey. the former of whom had been a cricket umpire at Trinity College. He was the one who negotiated the loans, and although he could only afford to live in a house the rental of which was £7 a year, could always find "hundreds'’ for the unsuspecting Mr Lane, at the usual exorbitant rates of interest. The evidence showed the defendant have been systematically fleeced by the two Mounceys, and the jury found a verdict in his favour, the foreman observing it was their unanimous opinion that the case was very bad one indeed, a statement which was emphatically endorsed the judge.